the current image of good leaders can be idealistic and push aside anything outside the narrative as unfit, oftentimes working off personal gain rather than truly pushing to help others or groups
potentially limiting values may quickly fix a situation, but later on cause more harm than good
—> oftentime support self interest from fear of ego
role of leadership is to add value to others and influence is the main measurement
—> actions speak louder than words but words speak too
time + culture = values based leadership
→ clear principles, honest, truly inspire, give more than recieve
"what aspects include 2 concepts such as "leadership values" and "values based leadership?"
leadership values:
leadership values → related to personal & organizational purpose
most (if not all) true descriptions of leadership fall under 3 concepts→ personality, interaction/relationship and action
personality: leaders/companies who show clear vision of their values oftentimes produce employees who want to perform well, learn and grow. on the flip side, when companies/individuals push aside morals destroy sense of identity and community
interaction/relationship: leaders use strengths to tackle problems they have no tackled before & work to achieve true mastery in their strengths
→ leaders empasize COMMUNITY
action: good leaders offer meaning and value to not only potential work or progress, but to individual existence
flexible leadership is something done with people, not for
→ implemented through teaching, coaching, mentoring, acting & communicating
OUR OWN INPUT: personality/interaction/relationship - leaders were oftentimes seen to progress others, but spoke little about leaders growing by learning others. There's always room to grow, and in some terms the article shows aspects of leaders being imperfect
values based leadership: